Everyone debates robots that kill. The ones that change the map might just make you leave.
Everyone expects
Robot wars will be about killing.
What I found
They didn’t invade. They made sure nobody could live there.
Armies that mass to attack are seen and hit within minutes, so taking territory costs more than it’s worth. In this scenario, an aggressor stops trying. It carries small robots far behind the front line and leaves them there.
They don’t kill. Killing invites retaliation and a taboo. They make ordinary life fail, night after night: the car that won’t start, the road that’s blocked, the service that stops. Each incident is minor. Together they are a reason to leave.
The state pays compensation. A local paper runs the headline: “They replaced our car three times. We still left.” Money doesn’t restore the confidence to stay. Insurers reprice, the school loses its teachers, and the businesses that hold a community together close.
Protection fills the gap. Those who can pay hire security; elsewhere, whoever protects the village starts to govern it. The country keeps its borders and its army, and loses the ability to keep particular places viable.
Explore more of this kind of work
This is an original public scenario. Bring your subject, research or planning question to develop a world and explore its consequences.
Strategic wargaming and decision gamesAdd a brick only when the bricks below give a reason for it.
Everyone debates robots that kill. What about the ones that just make you leave?
ProblemSolution
The country survives. Its communities don’t.
Massed troops and vehicles are seen and hit within minutes. Taking territory costs more than it’s worth.
Small robots carried far behind the front line, staying for weeks.
Lethal machines risk escalation, a taboo, and the same done back to you.
Machines that make ordinary life fail, night after night, without hurting anyone.
The state replaces the car. Then it replaces it again. Families leave anyway.
Those who can pay hire security. Elsewhere, whoever protects the village starts to govern it.
It still owns the territory and can defend its borders. It can no longer keep people there.
The forest survives because nobody will buy its wood.
Everyone expectsForests are saved by agreements and incentives.
Suppose a superpower confronted with a climate emergency intervenes to make a forest’s products commercially unusable, then leaves. The premise is not conquest.
Follow how it could happenDo as we say, or no rain.
Everyone expectsGeoengineering is a shared climate response.
What if an intervention that improves conditions for one country worsens them for another?
Follow how it could happenThe government can decide anything. It just can’t do it.
Everyone expectsThe government decides to take back control.
A government recognises a dangerous dependency and decides to act. The suppliers have gone. The skills have faded. The infrastructure is committed elsewhere.
Follow how it could happenA subject, a technology, a question or a body of research.