Suppose a superpower confronted with a climate emergency intervenes to make a forest’s products commercially unusable, then leaves. The premise is not conquest. It is denying the value of extraction.
Inside this fictional bargain, radioactive contamination makes timber and other products commercially unattractive through stigma, restrictions and the difficulty of selling them. Participating communities judge the additional risks preferable to the dispossession they otherwise expect.
That is the conflict: institutions have failed to stop the destruction, and a coercive intervention changes what outsiders can gain. Other communities ask for the same arrangement. Environmental campaigners divide.
The scenario joins ecology to Negative Territorial Power: alter the landscape so particular uses no longer pay, without accepting responsibility for governing it. It explores the institutional and moral bargain, not an implementation proposal.
“For forty years governments promised to keep ranchers and miners out and failed.” — A voice from the scenario.
Explore more of this kind of work